LLPs: Is it Possible to Have Two Persons as a Joint Member of an LLP?

July 17, 2024

Introduction



The structure and governance of Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) often raise various questions, one of which is whether it is possible for two persons to hold a joint membership within an LLP. This blog delves into this question, offering legal insights based on the principles of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (LLPA 2000) and relevant case law.


Legal Framework and Key Principles


1. Membership of an LLP The primary statute governing LLPs in the UK is the LLPA 2000. According to Section 4 of the LLPA 2000:


· Initial Membership: On incorporation, the members of an LLP are the individuals who subscribe their names to the incorporation document.



· Subsequent Membership: Any other person may become a member in accordance with an agreement with the existing members.


The term "person" is crucial here and is used consistently throughout the LLPA 2000 in the context of membership.


2. Interpretation of "Person" The term "person" as used in the LLPA 2000 and related legislation such as the Companies Act 2006, typically refers to a single legal entity. Section 162 of the Companies Act 2006, as applied to LLPs, requires that LLPs maintain a register of members with details of "each person." This statutory language indicates that each member is considered a distinct legal person.


Can Two Persons Be a Single Member?


The ordinary legal interpretation of "person" does not include multiple individuals jointly holding a single membership. The statutory framework envisions a member as a single legal person, not a combination of individuals.


3. Legal Precedents In the case of Reinhard v Ondra LLP [2016] 2 BCLC 571, the court discussed the nature of membership rights in an LLP, highlighting that a member holds a bundle of financial and administrative rights. While financial rights might be held in trust for another party, administrative rights, such as voting, cannot be easily shared among multiple individuals.

The statutory interpretation and case law suggest that the concept of a "joint member" does not align with the intended legal structure of LLPs. Therefore, two persons cannot be recognized as a single, joint member within an LLP.


Practical Implications


4. Administrative Challenges If joint membership were allowed, it would create significant administrative complexities, especially in exercising voting rights and managing responsibilities. The legal framework is designed to ensure clarity and accountability, which would be compromised by joint membership.

5. Alternative Arrangements While joint membership is not permissible, LLPs can structure their agreements to accommodate the involvement of multiple individuals. For instance, one person can be a member while holding certain rights or interests in trust for another, or individuals can have separate memberships with clearly defined roles and responsibilities.


Conclusion


Based on the statutory language of the LLPA 2000 and relevant case law, it is clear that two persons cannot hold a joint membership in an LLP. The legal interpretation of "person" within the context of LLP membership requires each member to be a distinct legal entity. This ensures clarity, accountability, and effective governance within the LLP structure.

For more detailed guidance and to ensure compliance with the legal requirements, it is advisable to consult with legal professionals specializing in LLPs and corporate governance. This will help in structuring the LLP in a way that meets both legal standards and the operational needs of the business.

 

This analysis highlights the importance of understanding the legal nuances of LLP membership and provides practical insights for structuring LLP agreements effectively. Stay informed and consult with experts to navigate the complexities of LLP governance successfully.



November 24, 2025
A clear, contractor-friendly breakdown of payment applications, notices, and deadlines — and how subcontractors can protect their cashflow under UK construction law.
November 13, 2025
In the UK M&A landscape, the rules have changed — but too many deal processes haven’t. What used to be a structured checklist has evolved into a dynamic environment shaped by regulatory intervention, valuation tension and increasing due-diligence complexity. In this market, a transaction isn’t just a sequence of steps. It’s a challenge. And closing it requires legal support built for today’s risks, not yesterday’s playbook. At Kingsley Wood, we don’t simply manage deals. We execute them — decisively, strategically, and aligned with your commercial goals.
November 11, 2025
Understanding how a well-drafted adjudication clause can protect both homeowners and contractors from costly and time-consuming disputes.
November 7, 2025
How digital transformation, data, and regulation are reshaping the rules of HealthTech mergers and acquisitions.
November 4, 2025
In the world of construction, conflict often feels inevitable. With multiple stakeholders, complex contracts, tight deadlines, and high financial stakes, even minor misunderstandings can spiral into costly disputes. At Kingsley Wood, we believe the strongest projects aren’t those that win disputes — but those that never face them in the first place. By embedding conflict-avoidance strategies into every phase of a project, you safeguard relationships, protect resources, and deliver better results for everyone involved.
November 3, 2025
When challenges arise, the right legal guidance makes all the difference. In today’s unpredictable economic climate, both businesses and individuals can find themselves facing mounting financial pressure — from cash flow issues and creditor demands to unmanageable debt obligations. The prospect of insolvency can feel overwhelming, like being caught in an unrelenting storm without a clear course forward. At Kingsley Wood, we help you steady the ship. Our team of insolvency and restructuring specialists provides clarity, direction, and tailored strategies to help you regain control and move towards recovery with confidence.
October 31, 2025
In the fast-paced world of commercial construction, disputes are almost unavoidable — whether over payments, delays, variations, or defects. To prevent these disagreements from escalating into costly and time-consuming litigation, the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the “Construction Act”) grants parties a statutory right to adjudication — a swift and effective dispute resolution process tailored to the construction industry.
October 29, 2025
As educational equity continues to take centre stage, Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision in Multi-Academy Trusts (MATs) has become more than a statutory requirement—it’s a test of governance, financial foresight, and moral leadership.
Construction contract law, contract signing, legal advice, Kingsley Wood, construction disputes, acc
October 24, 2025
Think no signature means no contract? Think again. In construction, your actions can be just as binding as your pen. Discover why starting work before signing could cost you more than you think — and what to do to stay legally protected.
By Kishan Bhatt October 23, 2025
A look back at our September Partners Meeting at Carter Lane — where collaboration, growth, and shared vision came together.